Here it is again

A while ago, a woman who was fired by the Houston Chronicle for being a stripper or “exotic dancer” sued the Chronicle because it was sexist in firing her. Because she was a woman who was fired so it MUST be because of her gender not because of her actions.

She admitted that she did NOT tell them about her side job, as an “exotic dancer”.

She said the way they found out was because a reporter from another newspaper “outed her”.

So she hired Gloria Allred to defend her and she said “They fired me because I am a woman.” As my dad would say, “B-U-L-L-P-U-C-K-Y”!!!!!!!
I will have to yell the next part because clearly it is not getting through to her…
MA’AM IT WOULD NOT HAVE MATTERED IF YOU WERE A CHIPPENDALE DANCER!

You did something that the newspaper was NOT made aware of because apparently YOU were so embarrassed that you did this, that you did not want to tell the employer about it.
Since YOU found it to be embarrassing don’t you think your EMPLOYER could have found it embarrassing? You must have or else you would not have hidden it.

And even if there was no embarrassment in this don’t you think it would have been prudent to let your own bosses in on the deal so that they were not blindsided by the event?

In short my contention is that what you did was ultimately wrong! And you were called on it! Now you are going to use the laws that are supposed to protect people in order to force others to do what you want them to do, even though YOU are the one who is in the wrong.

This is an abuse of the system. In fact I would have NO issues with the idea that what you are doing is worse than any manipulation of the law that others do about, which, you would be the first to complain.

Think about it..

But this does bring me to a point that I want to make here…

Liberals love to lie. Yes I know that sounds like such a hateful statement but it has been MY experience that they do.

In fact it seems to me that they feel the ends always justify the means, no matter what. Sadly the worst of it is not even the lies though.

Let’s look at some recent events to prove my point. Obama has “declared executive privilege.” Why? Because Eric Holder is being held in contempt by congress for withholding information that they have requested, a criminal offense! But Obama has spoken so all us little peons better shape up and do as our great and grand lord and master has demanded.

BUT WAIT has Obama really invoked executive privilege? Some of his toadies have basically said so, but there is one little problem. In order for him to invoke executive privilege he would have to
a. do so in writing,
b. detail WHAT is under the privilege
c. put that out into a PUBLIC venue.

He has not done any of these things so technically he still has not gone that route, and even if he had, executive privilege CAN NOT be used to protect himself or others from repercussions from criminal acts.
Apparently the administration is in a position they do not like! And now they want to cover it up.
But trying to cover it up this way is the BEST way in the world to have to let everyone know what is going on which makes this counterproductive and injurious to their case.

Curiously the issue that the liberals in the media have latched onto is not the fact that Obama has not actually claimed executive privilege, or that he is covering something up, or that there was lying, or that such action is not allowed by law in cases of criminal activity.
No what they had to talk about on the subject right away was that, “Obama is hardly the FIRST president to have claimed Executive privilege.” Like that was really the issue in the first place.


But there you go, another example of how the ends justify the means.

How about the fact that they will resort to physical violence at meetings and events to try to shut up any one who speaks out against them?
Or the way that they will spread misinformation trying to make things seem to be other than they really are. As an example I would like to point out the “creative editing” of MSNBC regarding ANYTHING they are against. (the 911 call by George Zimmerman, What Mitt Romney said in Pennsylvania about Wawa’s)
Or when a blogger speaks out conservatively they make false allegations and even make false 911 phone calls to the police to report the blogger/s of crimes that were not committed.

Still clearly the ends must justify whatever means they employ.

Even if those means are illegal! They lie, but that is ok, they cheat, but that is ok, they steal, but that is ok, they cover up but that is ok, they practice hypocrisy even as they blame others of hypocrisy and they contradict themselves, but that is all ok…
As long as THEY get what they want. And it does not matter who gets hurt or trampled in the process.

Here is one last example, We all agree that bullying and intimidation are bad things right? In fact the media was all abuzz over reports that when he was in high school Mitt Romney MAY HAVE bullied someone.
But it is apparently O.K. that, not only has there been evidence of Obama doing the same thing as a child, but he told the Supreme Court that they had “better be very careful” about how they chose to go about looking at the issue of his health care initiative. Implying it was HIS idea and so they BETTER vote HIS way.
He did this last one just before they looked at his health care initiative to determine it’s constitutionality.
So the ends justify the means even if they are illegal, or morally wrong , or just plain evil.

So there you go, today we get to think about the future, and in those thoughts as we begin to look to the upcoming vote, please look at the person who you want to vote for.
Let us put people in control of the government who will be honest and truthful at least as much as possible. And let us pick those who will be held accountable.