First a disclaimer, I hate the conspiracy theorists and the language they use but in this case I feel like I have no choice.
For the record this is not a conspiracy theory, this is observation of the facts around us and the inevitable conclusion a thinking person comes to when he or she really looks at all the REAL facts.
As for the usage of they in this article, it refers to the people who are pushing the global warming agenda on all the regular folks out there.
So, now for the actual Blog.
Global warming, excuse me, Climate change is an interesting subject to speculate on. Unfortunately I have a problem with the way they talk about it.
Here is the problem; they claim that everything proves their theory.
Why is that a problem?
This is a tactic that has been used time after time before. The technique is to try to convince people you or your product has the answer to the problems people are facing.
Or, if there are no problems, to manufacture a problem ala the Music Man.
This is a lot like the flimflam artist of yesteryear who would tell you that what just happened was what he expected, even though that is a lie.
In other words to lie your face off until you get what you want, namely the fleecing of the gullible rubes who are taken in by your slick patter and lies.
And when people catch on Re-brand.
For example; if you were trying to get people to buy what your trying to foist on them you would say that anything that happens proves you to be right. You would try to hide your deception with misdirection and you would twist facts to match what you claim.
And in the meantime as you make your claims you live in the lap of luxury that you are denying others. Sort of like a cult leader.
So how does this fit the Climate change debacle? Well let’s look at the facts.
First of all they made claims about what would happen. “All the coastal cities would be flooded! By 1995, oops 2000, oops make that 2010, oops ummm, well we will never ever see snow again ooops I meant that was the last year we were going to see snow, Oops."
Or how about...
"Well all the snow at the poles is going to melt away by _________." (The blank is a lot like the predictions about the flooding. They made multiple predictions involving multiple years and ALL of them have failed to come true.)
So these predictions have all reached their time limits and have ALL failed in detail. So they manufactured a problem to sell the people.
Second they, falsified the data using manufactured statistics to “prove” their point, or they skewed the data throwing out anything that proved them wrong. Then they got CAUGHT at it remember the emails that were intercepted that proved the scientists were making it up? They were falsifying data or using only data that would look like they were right. It was big news for a whole week… Oh yeah that’s right I forgot they pulled the Wizard of Oz trick. (“Pay NO attention to the man behind the curtain.)
"We have records showing global warming." "It is proven science."
Really? where would that be? Because real science has now shown the earth stopped it's warming trend 18 years ago!
When that began to fail and they thought people would start to see through it they went for the re-brand changing the title from Global warming to Climate change.
That gave them a second wind, then they started claiming that everything that happens proves them right, so they would be able to avoid that issue again.
“Oh Look, it is raining that proves what I said.” Two days later? “Oh look it is sunny that proves what I said!” wait a minute now if your claim is that RAIN is proof of your theory then a SUNNY day which is the opposite of a rainy day would DISPROVE your claim.
"Well but it is sunny and that causes evaporation which would mean more precipitation, besides there is drought in some parts of the country and you have to think globally and ignore local weather conditions."
Really? While you focus SOLELY on local conditions to "prove" your point? But I digress, The problem with your Precipitation point is that that would mean increased rain; but if everything were warmer as you claim, it would NOT be as cold as it has been this past few years, and there would NOT have been snow like there has for the past decade.
What else do they have?
“Well more storms prove Climate change, no wait it is fewer storms that prove it, no no Bigger storms prove it, NO it’s Milder storms, no wait It’s seen in the increases in drought, no it is localized flooding.”
Oh so anything that happens proves you right? Even when the so-called proof is the total opposite of the “proof” you referenced yesterday? “Yup that’s about it.”
And when you start to question that, they simply make it a statement. “ Global Warming, err Climate change is real we just have to accept that”. And then slander or threaten, “only idiots would deny global… um Climate change” or (as someone recently said) “We ought to behead all the global warming deniers. They are the real problem.”
So what is the payoff for the GW/CC folks?
Simple.
See for the world to be saved, YOU have to give up YOUR “luxury” items.
You may no longer have lights in your house because they use electricity. To make electricity we have to manufacture it through power plants, these create “greenhouse gases”. So if we are going to get this problem under control YOU have to give up your lights.
Also your food. “All food processing involves processes, which will produce greenhouse gases so…” and of course your car, which produces, uh huh that’s right.
Oh yeah and your heat and your entertainment and your family and your vacation and your…
You start to get the idea?
The first level of payoff is they get to tell you how to live. They tell you where you can go, what to eat and what you can do. Total control of your life. That kind of control is power! Of course it is all because they “care about you” and “know better than you what is good for you”.
Meantime they are getting to eat what they want and squander all those resources you saved by giving up your stuff.
Remember earth day? What do we do on that day? Give up an hour of our electricity! Who has been most notable about ignoring that hour? Al Gore. Chief Global Warming spokesman himself.
We give up our cars while Gore and others like him fly in private jets to meetings in exotic locations, and once there, they have convoys of gas guzzling S.U.Vs driving them around, producing more pollution in that one trip than your car would have made in a month.
Meanwhile, lucky you, you get to have a “staycation”.
What else? Well after all this they will also be able to be the elite, getting to own or have things that you and yours cannot have anymore because it just isn’t safe for you to have it.
They are attempting to make an elitist caste system for all of us and we are willingly going into it with our gullibility. They have actually convinced us it is a good thing to kill ourselves off for their pleasure.
Time to wake up and question the “facts” that they are showing us.
Consider what the New York Post had to say not too long ago.
(NY POST) 9-14-2014 -- According to NASA satellites and all ground-based temperature measurements, global warming ceased in the late 1990s. This when CO2 levels have risen almost 10 percent since 1997. The post-1997 CO2 emissions represent an astonishing 30 percent of all human-related emissions since the Industrial Revolution began. That we’ve seen no warming contradicts all CO2-based climate models upon which global-warming concerns are founded.
Rates of sea-level rise remain small and are even slowing, over recent decades averaging about 1 millimeter per year as measured by tide gauges and 2 to 3 mm/year as inferred from “adjusted” satellite data. Again, this is far less than what the alarmists suggested.
Satellites also show that a greater area of Antarctic sea ice exists now than any time since space-based measurements began in 1979. In other words, the ice caps aren’t melting.
A 2012 IPCC report concluded that there has been no significant increase in either the frequency or intensity of extreme weather events in the modern era. The NI
And there you have it folks from there own mouths.
Quick update,
Since I wrote this article it has come out that some environmental groups have declared that in order to stop global warming we would have to reduce ALL CO2 emissions to 0. in other words, Absolutely Nothing could emit any CO2 to "solve" this problem.
Let us think this through now...
That means we have to stop ALL volcanic Activity and literally KILL every single living creature on the planet that breathes out CO2. Complete extinction complete annihilation!
But wait! Plants breathe IN CO2 and breathe OUT Oxygen. So if you shut off ALL CO2 production eventually the plants will have nothing to breathe and at that point they all die too.
The "scientists" who are trying to fix the problem then would cause an extinction level event that would literally result in the earth being ultimately completely devoid of any life whatsoever? Are these the people you would trust to lead you through a disaster?
No comments:
Post a Comment